“90999”
January 25, 2010
By: Militant Jones
“Come on children, you’re acting like children. Every generation thinks it’s the end of the world.” – Jeff Tweedy
What is it your folks always say about the good old days? “When I was young, we didn’t have (insert specimen of modern technology).” “We didn’t have cell phones or the Internet, and television had only five channels.” Kids these days.
My generation has been weaned on contemporary technological advancements from the womb. It has been our savior, and yet millions of people love to lament that it is simultaneously our downfall. We cohabit a rapidly advancing planet, a vast network of buttons and answers at mere fingertips; ironically, the more the network expands, the smaller everything becomes. Conventional wisdom alleges that this postmodern dichotomy serves more harm than good, while evangelicals wax that technological excess is a Wi-fi connection directly linked to the apocalypse.
Not to be misleading: I myself have taken part in countless Orwellian elegies in my (still) early years. I got my first cell phone when I was sixteen. I was appalled a few years later when my parents decided to get my twelve-year old sister her own cell. I argued that I needed mine because I had just received a driver’s license, as if the two were somehow inexorable. Looking back, what I was probably doing is searching for logical means of convincing myself that my dependency on instant connection was warranted by nature, instead of, well, sheer dependency. It wasn’t until recently that I fully realized the positive affects that big brother could have on the most critical (and oldest) of modern networks: humanity.
The tragedy in Haiti is so grand, on a scale so vast, it has the potential to devastate an entire country forever. Not just years, but decades, perhaps centuries, and in truth they might never fully recover. This gloomy forecast is likely not to rain true, and for one simple reason: your cell phone. Over the past week, every news outlet, every television network, and every prominent website has shown us endlessly how easy it is to help rebuild a tattered nation. By simply texting “Haiti” to 90999, you donate $10 dollars to the Red Cross Haitian Relief Fund, and the money goes directly to your cell phone bill.
Read that again. Think about it. I helped Haiti from my bed, while watching a Laker game. It sounds trite, but think about the ease with which I donated to such a worthy cause. Now try to imagine that you don’t have a cell phone. You don’t have cable, so you can’t watch the Lakers game and see the prompt at the bottom of the screen. You don’t have the internet, and you cant see photos of the catastrophe that has befallen an innocent people (yes, Pat Robertson, I said innocent.) I’m obviously being hyperbolic for effect, but I’m sure you know what I mean. But ask yourself if you and your friends would have gone out of the way to donate to the Red Cross were it not made so simple. Probably not. And this is okay; 99.9% of the world is fiscally fettered, and the intuitive reaction to a donation plea is typically along the lines of “whatever I can afford to give wont make a difference. But you do have 10 bucks.
Now, it has become fashionable as a society to publicly wish that you could shut off your email account, throw your cell phone in the trash, move to a deserted island in the Pacific and never be reached. I really don’t want to live without my iPhone. Of course of become codependent on it – have you ever played with an iPhone? It’s fucking awesome. It is hands down the most useful thing I have ever owned. I was in the middle of nowhere outside LA a few weeks ago, and was on an empty tank of gas. Pulled out my phone, opened the app “Gas buddy”, found the nearest gas station, and within minutes I was back on my way to civilization, all while streaming the latest podcast of “This American Life” directly to my phone. This is a prefect microcosm of what has become my predominant feeling towards technology. Part novelty, part necessity.
I used to share a disdain similar to that of my sister’s cell phone towards Twitter. The sire struck me as vain, self-indulgent, and purposeless. And while I still agree that most people use Twitter this way, I became aware of its benefits. To wit…
In 2009, Iranian incumbent dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad used his fleeting power over the country’s military outfits to steal Iran’s first ever democratic election from challenger and leader of the Green party, MirHossein Mousavi (for those unfamiliar with the situation, Mousavi is Iran’s version of Barack Obama: peace, hope, change, etc.). Ahmadinejad staged a military coup on his own government, which was hours away from fairly announcing Mousavi as the new President of Iran. Mousavi, who had been utilizing Twitter during his campaign as a means to reach out to the young citizens of Iran’s mostly under-30 capital city Tehran, caught wind of Amedinejad’s impending forces. He immediately went to Twitter and tweeted the following: “#iranelection – In case of the arrest of any of the Green movement’s leaders, take to the streets in Tehran: Enghelab to Azadi. Tell everyone.”
“Enghelab to Azadi.” Translation: Death to the Dictator. That night, the people of Tehran shouted from their rooftops until sunrise. Now imagine the state of Iran without Twitter. It sounds utterly ridiculous, but its also incredibly profound. And this is the presiding fact about the state of modern technology that skeptics choose to ignore. For starters, most of said skeptics are terrified of technology simply because they don’t know how to use it, and that makes them uncomfortable.
Say what you want about Grandpa’s ‘good ol’ days’. As I recall, those were the same good ol’ days when women weren’t allowed to work and blacks weren’t allowed to vote. It’s the task of our generation and every generation that follows to use the advantages of our ever expanding, ever shrinking world to better the whole of humanity. You could start by texting “Haiti” to 90999… if you give a tweet.
P.S. if you have not already done so, please donate to the Red Cross. Times are tough everywhere, sure. But as someone who lived through the Los Angeles earthquake of ’94, I can tell you first hand that there is nothing more terrifying than wondering if your loved ones are alive or dead. Thanks.
Excellent point on technology. Technology is amoral, like a brick. You can use a brick to build a hospital or bash a man’s skull in. It all depends on how you use it.
I’m not sure I agree with your entire sentiment.
The first problem with Haiti, and many recent catastrophes, is how we’re told to funnel all our money to one source… the Red Cross.
The Red Cross doesn’t help as much as people would like to think. Just google ‘Red Cross money pit’ or ‘waste money’, etc. The 9/11 Fund, the Midwest Floods, Bay area quake, Katrina relief. I lived on the Mississippi Gulf Coast at that time with no water for a week, no power for a month… and the Red Cross did practically nothing.
This doesn’t mean NO ONE should donate. My suggestion – go local. With Katrina, the Red Cross didn’t help and Bush’s FEMA sure as hell didn’t help (side note: although a moron, Rush Limbaugh’s point was true – don’t give money to the government. We all know, no matter WHAT party you side with, that government wastes money like no other organization on Earth. Is that perhaps the only time I’ll agree with Rush? Yes.). Studies showed it was the local organizations that helped the most. The nonreligious local charities, local churches of all faiths, even the Salvation Army… all far more effective. Why? Because they are THERE, in the community, etc. The Red Cross is not entrenched like these other places; they just appear. The church I attended at the time was inundated with calls from churches all over America. Trucks would come down, we’d take the shipments, and drive directly to places we knew needed it.
The other issue is that your argument has technology encouraging laziness. After all, you stated yourself that you were in bed watching a Lakers game. You also made an excellent point on how this tragedy is so massive, it may take generations to fix. So my question is: if it’s that huge, isn’t it worth the time to get up, go out, and find a local organization to help? I feel like technology being used like that is our society’s little escape hatch. “Well I texted, or called Idol Gives Back, or clicked DONATE online, etc. My mind is clear.”
So to recap – technology encourages us to do less when sometimes more is required. And if all you can do because of time/work/physical constraints is donate money then make sure you know where it’s going. You may not be able to research EVERYTHING, but as you mentioned, having an iPhone gives you the ability to find things quickly. Far too many times the Red Cross has helped little while leaving A LOT on the table, which ends up in their pockets.
I apologize if this comes across too brazen or rude. I just wanted to respectfully offer another opinion. I’m a bit passionate when it comes to outreach.
Technology changes so fast, sometimes is feels like it’s going too fast. Example: Newton Tablet to Palm Pilot to IPhone to Kindle. No doubt Iphone will be obsolete one day, just as Google will, too. Granted that might take a bit longer than it took for other tech. The new tech I’m looking forward to is tablets that use IPhone-like OS, as opposed to traditional desktops, and wearable computers that interface with the body in new ways. (See my website for a speculative fiction series I’m writing about computers inside contact lenses!!)
RE: the Haiti thing, my wife and I donated to Doctors Without Borders, because they lost three clinics that had been in place doing good work for a long time. Now, shortly after doing this, I felt was inundated with calls for help in MSM, but most annoyingly on FB. Somehow I got invited to a FB event that was asking for non-perishable food, diapers, etc, and I wrote back to the admin that I thought it was better to send money, as transportation to Haiti is tricky. Then I got some grief from the guy, and I’m thinking, wtf? Using tech to get resources to areas that need them is great, but what about all the scams out there? (I think the event was a scam–that’s not cynical, just got that funny feeling.) And you know, a lot of the aid that people send, either in $ or in clothes, whatever, does get wasted, manipulated, etc. That’s just how these massive orgs work. Greenpeace, for instance, has something like a 60% overhead. So for every dollar you donate, only 40 cents goes to the cause. Compare to Walk For Hunger, which gives close to 90% of a dollar to actual programs.
Tech requires us to do our research, or get hosed. Tech also allows us to cheat the natural world and leverage our lives. Caveman vs. Techman, who wins? Most of the time, Techman. Until Techman loses his IPhone and can’t remember anything for himself.
For a refreshing read on how Internets have dumbed us down, and propelled us towards a world where large interests might have even more sway over us than they did pre- Great Democracy of the Interent, check out You Are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier.